nasaforums.com

Official Forums of the National Auto Sport Association
It is currently Fri Sep 21, 2018 12:12 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2018 2:26 pm 
Offline
Forum Hot Lapper
Forum Hot Lapper

Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2015 4:59 am
Posts: 98
I understand that the intent of the fender rule is to limit the cost of builds, but in practice the rule doesn’t seem to make any sense so wondering what others think? Perfectly legal to bring out a well prepared E46 M that can be easily a $50k+ build running 275’s comfortable under the stock panels. Or a Vette which has the same ability. Yet it’s illegal for a $15k e36 to add a $1500 body kit to properly fit 275’s. What’s allowed is flares that leave 275’s on an e36 exposed and obviously cause an aero deficit to an e46 M. So, why bother with a fender rule when all it does is limit the ability to further prepare older more narrow chassis cars? Once again it’s great in theory, but the rule just doesn’t make any sense in the real world. Obviously an e36 can fit 245’s and avoid the negative aero impact of having 275’s stick out, so that’s not my point. Certain short tracks, like a LRP, benefit from a wider tire. So it’s nice to have flexibility based on track. The tire mod already takes into account someone wanting to run wider tires. That should be sufficient without fender rules.


Last edited by daytonars4 on Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:14 pm 
Offline
Forum Spectator
Forum Spectator

Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 2:00 pm
Posts: 35
Add into that the extreme fender modifications the guy that just won at cota has and it’s seems silly that “limiting costs” excise is used when none of the big ticket items are regulated.

_________________
Chris Davis
NASA MA GTS2/ST4 #17


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:58 am 
Offline
Forum Hot Lapper
Forum Hot Lapper

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:19 pm
Posts: 74
focusedintntions wrote:
Add into that the extreme fender modifications the guy that just won at cota has and it’s seems silly that “limiting costs” excise is used when none of the big ticket items are regulated.


Those are stock fenders with no metal added, just my metal working skills.

To the original poster, there are lots of legal fender flares in ST4 for E36 cars, are you referring to the kits that have venting that are not legal?

-tony
TC Design


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 8:08 am 
Offline
Forum Hot Lapper
Forum Hot Lapper

Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2015 4:59 am
Posts: 98
tcdesign wrote:
focusedintntions wrote:
Add into that the extreme fender modifications the guy that just won at cota has and it’s seems silly that “limiting costs” excise is used when none of the big ticket items are regulated.


Those are stock fenders with no metal added, just my metal working skills.

To the original poster, there are lots of legal fender flares in ST4 for E36 cars, are you referring to the kits that have venting that are not legal?

-tony
TC Design



We are all familiar with your impressive fender work :D

It's not just venting that makes wider fenders illegal. There is a very limited view of whats legal. It is only allowed to cover the top of the tire as opposed to an e46 having the ability to fully cover a 275, or have a 245 but with a wider track allowing greater stability. While at the same time with the e46 not creating any compromise to aero. I understand the premise of the rule, but it just seems to put the more narrow chassis cars at a disadvantage. If a client walks into your shop today and says "Build me the baddest BMW ST4 car you can." Are you going to suggest an e46 M chassis or a e36 with the limited option bolt on fenders? My guess is even if the fender rule was not there your answer to the previous question would still be the same?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 8:21 am 
Offline
Forum Spectator
Forum Spectator

Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 2:00 pm
Posts: 35
tcdesign wrote:
focusedintntions wrote:
Add into that the extreme fender modifications the guy that just won at cota has and it’s seems silly that “limiting costs” excise is used when none of the big ticket items are regulated.


Those are stock fenders with no metal added, just my metal working skills.

To the original poster, there are lots of legal fender flares in ST4 for E36 cars, are you referring to the kits that have venting that are not legal?

-tony
TC Design



Tony,
I'm well aware of you're amazing metal working skills. But if that kind of work becomes the norm to build a front running car it defeats the point of some of the "cost cutting" measures (looking at you canards) that were implemented. Please correct me if i'm wrong, but I'm fairly certain that the level of craftsmanship you've shown is significantly more than a set of $400 rivet on flairs. That's really my only concern.

_________________
Chris Davis
NASA MA GTS2/ST4 #17


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 2:02 pm 
Offline
Forum Hot Lapper
Forum Hot Lapper

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:19 pm
Posts: 74
For ST4, I would choose a 4 door E46 chassis if the customers goal was "fastest ST4 BMW" given the current iteration of rules.

The car that won ST4 was actually built as a ST3/EO car, the customer then switched classes this year as there has been more competition in ST4 in Norcal. If you looked there was very little spacer on that car, it could have run stock, just slightly modified fenders and covered the 245's no problem.

I hear both of you and fully agree. The speeds that ST4 cars go, you can have any flare and vent and its not going to make a real difference in the speed of the car. There are so many off the shelf choices, it doesn't make sense some of the limitations that are in the ST4 aero rules. In particular the front air dam/splitter rules. There are $99 air dam/splitters on ebay that fit miata's that work perfect, but are not legal. To make something legal is 4-10x the cost for no speed difference. Same thing with the E46 cars. There are off the shelf air dam splitters that work great, but don't meet the vertical ST4 rule, again to make a part that is compliant, yet not any slower is a multiple of that price.

I have actual data with 4 different bumper/fender combinations on the front of my GTS3/ST3 E36. The difference in speed whether it be down a straight, or in a corner, is less than the difference of being .5mph min speed faster in turn 14 at Thunderhill and your final speed at the end of the straight. I'm a decent driver, holding .5mph consistency in that corner is about my threshold of ability.

-tony


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 4:19 pm 
Offline
Forum Hot Lapper
Forum Hot Lapper

Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2015 4:59 am
Posts: 98
I have always felt that if rules were made in consultation with respected shops in the community the end result would be better because there would be less of the “that doesn’t make sense” type of rules. Thanks for the feedback :D


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group